| I recently attended one of
the Labor Day Weekend Production sales and saw several things that
continue to cause me to have concerns about the ethics that may or
may not be associated with individual production sales. During the
sale I attended, I purchased a nice looking doe that I had not even
considered buying but the price was very low and the commentator
stated she had no problems. Immediately after getting home and
unloading the 3 animals I bought, I spotted a potential problem that
was not easily seen from the audience and would have been next to
impossible for anyone watching on the internet to have seen what I
did not notice while sitting in the audience. Thus, if potential
buyers, especially over the internet, can't rely on the breeders to
put clean, healthy animals in the ring and have the commentator
state all potential issues, we believe potential buyers in the
future should be very careful in what they purchase. |
|
Our
vision of the Ideal Ethical Environment for Production Sales
When we first started in the Boer goat
industry, we would tell people to be very careful about buying
animals at a local, weekly/monthly sale because you may be buying
another breeder's problems. We recommended they consider buying from
a production sale because we believed animals sold in that
environment were the best animals the breeders had to offer and they
would not be offering "problem" goats. That naive vision of the
industry was very quickly dashed as we realized when money is
involved, some breeders will do anything to sell as many animals as
possible regardless of cull factors, health issues or whatever. The
first time we noticed it was associated with a very well known
breeder that was part of the original group that created ABGA. That
breeder had their own production sale, which we have never attended.
Then as more and more production sales started to appear, this well
known breeder was asked to add some animals to other productions
sales to help draw in more buyers. We did attend some of those
sales.
The first one we attended, the well known
breeder was actually the commentator for the sale. We were looking
through the animals prior to the start of the sale and all of a
sudden came across an animal with a major abscess located on the
body exactly where CL abscesses would be. As we continued to review
the animals, we saw animals that had fresh scar areas where an
abscess had been lanced. You could see older scars on other animals
where we knew that abscesses had been lanced. When we looked at the
mouth, we saw all sorts of problems and the same with the teats. All
of the animals we saw problems with were put in the sale by the same
breeder, the well known breeder. He would not have put that type of
animal in his sale but he had no problem with dumping them on buyers
attending sales that weren't his. We saw his name listed in a
minimum of 3-4 sales that year in addition to his own sale. We just
don't believe that an ethical breeder would do that and we have
never purchased an animal from him or any that had his genetics
associated in a major way in other animals
So here is what we consider ethical breeders
would focus on when putting on a production sale and it is the
ethics we try to practice as we sell private treaty. We have never
participated in any production sale even though we have been offered
the opportunity and we see nothing in the future to change that.
- A production
sale should have some ethical standards that all participating
breeders will be required to follow.
A production sale generally
builds a reputation that comes from the combination of the
participating breeders ethics in the type of animals they put in
the sale, how honest they are with potential buyers and how they
treat breeders that purchase animals from their sale. We don't
attend many production sales any more but here are some examples
of production sales we feel have a consistent ethical standard
about what was just mentioned. The Silver Gate sale with Jim and
Lynn Farmer that we have known ever since we got into the
industry. The Show Stopper sale with the Edwards and Ryals. We
attended the first three Showstopper sales when it was made up
of Edwards, Ryals and Ben Stanz. The Elite Coalition sale. We
have known most of the breeders in that sale for many years and
have attended the last three. We have also tested their patience
for the last two years as we raised potential concerns we had
with animals we purchased. They handled both of our concerns and
it ended up that there was no problems what so ever. The vast
majority of our breeding program has been created with the
animals we purchased from those three production sales and we
always feel comfortable recommending breeders to consider
participating in their sale if they are looking for top quality
animals.
What did not meet our expectations was the production sale we
attended this Labor Day weekend. I saw animals there that I did
not believe would be offered at the sales I mentioned above. I
saw animals with clear cull factors that weren't mentioned by
the commentator or the commentator minimized how serious the
cull factor was. I purchased an animal that I believe has a
health issue that was not mentioned. We are now seeing breeders
buying over the internet that can't personally inspect animals
and are going to be very disappointed when some of their
purchases are delivered.
- Internet buyers
must be told about ANY issue they cannot see on the video but
would be able to spot if they were at the sale to do a personal
inspection.
While this is intended to protect the internet
buyer, it helps the buyer in the audience that did not expect to
purchase a specific animal but the price was too good to pass
up. We see more and more breeders using the
internet to participate in production sales that they just can't
personally attend. A production sale with an ethical focus would
not allow a buyer to purchase an animal with a known issue that
may affect a buyer's decision. Two of the best production sales
we have seen related to this is the Silver Gate and Showstopper
sales. Too many times we have heard Lynn Farmer or John Edwards
say "I want to alert you" or "I want to point out" about some
potential issue with an animal. Buyers need to have a
comfortable feeing that some problem with an animal is going to
be sneaked by the buyer.
- It is the buyer's ultimate
responsibility to know what they are buying and take
responsibility for the purchase.
That should always be the final rule.
However, I believe an ethical focused production sale will help
the potential buyers fully understand what they may be
getting... good or bad. When a breeder buys an animal and
finds a problem that they did not know about when they were
bidding, they will have negative feelings about trusting that
breeder again in the future. That is why the three sales I have
mentioned seem to have a longer term focus than many of the
other sales that are popping up now. To some of the breeders
participating in these new sales, long term means will they sell
the animals they are offering that day and not have to carry
them home.
- Breeders should not offer animals
in a sale that they will not be proud to represent them in the
industry.
Earlier I talked about the well
known breeder that was participating in so many other sales and
putting animals in with cull factors and health issues. Do you
think he likes to be known for raising them. His problem was he
was so well known that it did not matter for a while that he was
polluting the industry with culls or animals with CL. I don't
see him participating in many sells anymore. I know of some
production sales that quit inviting him to their sale. That is
good but many of those production sales got the bad reputation
and many are no longer with us. We have also attended a
production sale where the owner of a national grand champion
buck was invited as a guest consignor. He brought
offspring from his buck. As we eagerly looked at them, we found
teat and mouth problems over and over. Our thoughts were either
that buck produces a lot of animals with culls or the owner was
just bringing animals with culls to get rid of them before his
own production sale occurred. Either way, we stay as far away
from any genetics coming out of that buck. There are too many
nice animals in the industry now to take any chances about
whether the buck or the owner was the problem.
- Breeders should give fairly honest
descriptions and pictures in catalog
I was really disappointed in this
last production sale I attended after reviewing the catalog
prior to attending the sale. First there was at least one doe
sold that had a picture that had been taken several years
earlier when she looked much better. Another issue was seeing
write-up saying "straight from our show string" and yet when I
checked on the ABGA online database, the animal had never won at
a show. What does that tell you about a breeder if they mislead
breeders like that? Another statement would be "own an animal
that already has show points". When I looked it up, they may
have 1-4 points and it looked like there was little to no
competition when they won. The last concern was seeing that a
breeder was offering a 18 month old doe they had bought from
another well known breeder but when I checked on the doe, she
did not have any kids registered and showed no signs that she
had ever kidded. Why would someone buy a high priced doe, not
get any kids that they would register and then put her in a
sale? I would have major concerns about buying that doe.
- The commentator should be more than
a cheer leader selling the animals at a production sale.
This is a major peeve of mine. We
have attended so many sales and listened to commentator after
commentator that had nothing but good things to say about every
animal. When we started listening to that, we know we can't take
anything they are saying as useful. At the Labor Day weekend
sale I attended I was going around looking at animals prior to
the sale with some new friends. They wanted to know what we look
for in the animals and if I would look at some they were
considering buying. I was happy to do that. They had two young
doe kids they wanted to consider buying because the kids were
out of the main genetics coming to the sale. I looked at the
first doe and told them to look at the mouth with me. It was
really off badly. We went to the next doe kid which was a
sister to the first one. When we looked at the second ones
mouth, it was worse than the first. I then made a comment that
seeing two bad mouths with the same genetics raises a major red
flag that either the sire, the dam or the combination of the two
may consistently produce kids with cull factors. We looked at
another animal out of the buck and it had a bad mouth.
When the first doe kid came up in the sale, the mouth was not
mentioned by the commentator. The second one came into the ring
and the commentator mentioned the mouth was off "a little" but
should be correcting as she got older. This was the one with the
worse mouth and had a gap around 1/4 of an inch at the age of
4-5 months. When the lower teeth are missing the pad by that
much, it is only going to get worse. The Boer standards require
the teeth and pad match until they are two years old and then
can have a gap of 1/4 inch. This means the associations expect
the lower teeth to move farther away from the pad as the animal
gets older. So this commentator was completely wrong in what he
said. If the commentator did
not know any better, he should not have been doing the
commentary. If he did know better, breeders should remember his
name and know they may not be able to trust him or do business with him in the
future.
We fully understand the commentator is there to help sell the
animals by pointing out the good features. However, when they go
to extremes to make every feature sound great and totally ignore
the problems, they have hurt the reputation of the production
sale as well as the commentator their self.
|
|
Summary
We believe breeders that attend production
sales personally or by internet should start to demand some type of
ethics focus by the production sales. How can breeders demand that?
- If you attend the sale in person, do a
good review of several animals even ones that you don't plan to
consider bidding on.
- Document the problems in your catalog
- Listen to what the commentator says
about the animals you saw with problems and determine if they
gave internet viewers a good description of the problem areas.
- Look at the animals you saw with
problems and see if they came from the same breeder and/or the
same genetics.
- Share the general information, good or
bad, with your friends to help them know if they can or cannot
trust the contents of that production sale.
- If you watch by internet, try to find
breeders that many have been at the sale and see what their
thoughts were.
- Do not support any breeders that you
feel offered sub-quality animals, had multiple animals with
culls, did not have the animals accurately described by the
commentator.
- If you find a breeder that you don't
feel has good ethics related to animals offered in production
sales, don't support them by buying animals private treaty or
second hand from another breeder that bought the breeder's
animals
There are too many good animals and genetics
in the US now to support breeders that don't have good ethics in
their offering animals through production sales. The only way the
industry can get these production sales cleaned up is to quit
supporting them with purchases. We will not be supporting the sale
we attended this Labor Day weekend and especially not some of the
breeders that were cosigners.
We will add the next section of this article
by September 10. That section will review an animal we purchased at
the production sale, a problem we saw after the sale and the breeder
thinking I was enough of an idiot to believe the problem occurred
after we left the sale. It should be good watching me prove I am an
idiot. |